Luis Figo, the Portuguese football legend, has publicly demanded the resignation of FIFA President Gianni Infantino, citing what he describes as "the lowest, most deceitful and cravenly self-interested behaviour" witnessed in recent days. Figo's scathing remarks were published on August 5, 2026, as he expressed deep concern over Infantino's handling of FIFA's affairs, particularly a controversial plan to sell shares of the World Cup to private investors.
Why it matters: Figo's condemnation of Infantino reflects growing discontent within the football community over FIFA's leadership. His call for resignation comes at a time when FIFA faces scrutiny over transparency and governance issues.
Figo, a former professional player for two decades, argues that Infantino's actions are detrimental to the sport's integrity.
The criticism highlights a broader sentiment among football stakeholders who demand accountability from FIFA's leadership.
Figo's article has gained traction, echoing with fans and professionals alike who seek reform in football governance.
Driving the news: Infantino is reportedly holding crisis talks with FIFA staff following Figo's allegations. An urgent meeting has been called in Morocco to address the fallout from these claims.
Figo accuses Infantino of attempting to push through major changes that would primarily benefit himself and his associates.
The plan allegedly involves securing a $30 million annual salary for Infantino, which would be five times his current pay.
This proposed financial arrangement has raised eyebrows, particularly concerning its implications for the future of the World Cup.
State of play: Figo's article outlines specific grievances against Infantino, emphasizing a lack of transparency in FIFA's dealings.
He questions why Infantino did not disclose the details of this plan to FIFA members before a major World Cup event.
Figo highlights that the sale of World Cup shares would permanently disinherit future generations from ownership.
He argues that FIFA's $5 billion reserves could adequately fund football development without resorting to outside investment.
The big picture: Figo's critique is set against a backdrop of increasing scrutiny of FIFA's governance practices.
Accusations of "mob-like behaviour" have emerged, with Jordan FA President Prince Ali alleging that FIFA obstructs the work of national federations.
Concerns about the integrity of FIFA's decision-making processes continue to mount, particularly in light of past controversies.
Figo's call for reform resonates with those advocating for a more equitable and transparent approach to football management.
What they're saying: Figo's comments have sparked discussions across social media and within the football community.
Many supporters echo Figo's sentiments, calling for a leadership change at FIFA to restore trust in the organization.
Critics of Infantino's presidency argue that his focus on financial gain undermines the sport's core values.
Figo's position as a respected figure in football lends weight to his criticism, making it difficult for FIFA to dismiss the concerns raised.
By the numbers: The financial implications of Infantino's alleged plan are staggering.
Infantino's potential salary increase to $30 million annually has raised eyebrows, considering the current financial climate in global football.
FIFA's reserves stand at approximately $5 billion, which Figo argues should be utilized for grassroots football development instead of lining the pockets of executives.
The urgency of the situation is underscored by Infantino's immediate crisis meetings, indicating a recognition of the gravity of Figo's allegations.
Between the lines: Figo's article is not just a personal attack on Infantino; it reflects a wider discontent with FIFA's governance.
Figo's experiences as a player inform his perspective, giving him credibility as he critiques the current leadership.
The mention of the $5 billion reserves suggests a feasible alternative to outside investment, emphasizing the need for responsible financial management.
Figo's advocacy for youth development in football highlights a fundamental shift in priorities that many in the sport are calling for.
What's next: The fallout from Figo's article will likely lead to increased pressure on Infantino and FIFA.
Infantino's crisis meetings may yield new strategies to address the concerns raised, but skepticism remains high.
Figo's call for resignation could galvanize other football leaders to speak out, potentially leading to more widespread reform efforts.
As the situation develops, fans and stakeholders will be closely watching how FIFA responds to these serious allegations.
In a world where football continues to evolve, the integrity of its governing bodies is under intense scrutiny. The coming days will reveal whether FIFA can navigate this crisis and restore faith among its members and the global football community.